Add mpsii comments mapping refactor

[jorg3lopez]

#Refactoring of original PR (Add mpsii comments mapping refactor)

Describe what changed in this PR at a high level.

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Exception Handling The change from NullPointerException to IllegalArgumentException for missing fields should be validated to ensure it aligns with the overall error handling strategy of the application.

[github-actions]

Consider adding a null check for bundle in extractMsh41Identifier method to prevent potential NullPointerExceptions. This is important as the method assumes bundle is not null. [important]

[github-actions]

Refactor the validateField method to handle different types of validation based on the field type or requirements. This could improve the flexibility and reusability of the validation logic. [medium]

[github-actions]

Consider using a more specific exception than IllegalArgumentException for different validation failures in validateField, such as MissingFieldException or InvalidFieldException, to provide clearer error information. [important]

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Add a null check for bundle to prevent potential runtime exceptions Consider adding a null check for bundle in the extractMsh41Identifier method to prevent potential NullPointerException when accessing methods on bundle. etor/src/main/java/gov/hhs/cdc/trustedintermediary/etor/ruleengine/transformation/custom/MapLocalObservationCodes.java [53] +if (bundle == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Bundle cannot be null."); var msh41Identifier = HapiHelper.getMSH4_1Identifier(bundle); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a null check for bundle in the extractMsh41Identifier method is a prudent safeguard. It prevents potential NullPointerException which could occur if bundle is null, thus enhancing the robustness and reliability of the code.	7
Enhancement	Enhance the exception message for better clarity and debugging Update the exception message to include more context about the missing field, which can aid in debugging and user error resolution. etor/src/test/groovy/gov/hhs/cdc/trustedintermediary/etor/ruleengine/transformation/custom/MapLocalObservationCodesTest.groovy [249] -def exceptionMessage = "missing or empty required field codingSystem" +def exceptionMessage = "Error: The required field 'codingSystem' is missing or empty." Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Enhancing the exception message to provide more context is a valid improvement. It aids in debugging and provides clearer error information to the user, making the system more user-friendly and maintainable.	6
Best practice	Use a more specific exception type for field validation to improve error clarity Refactor the validateField method to throw a more specific exception such as MissingFieldException instead of IllegalArgumentException to provide clearer semantics. etor/src/main/java/gov/hhs/cdc/trustedintermediary/etor/ruleengine/transformation/custom/MapLocalObservationCodes.java [76] -throw new IllegalArgumentException("missing or empty required field " + fieldName); +throw new MissingFieldException("missing or empty required field " + fieldName); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: While using a more specific exception type like MissingFieldException could improve error clarity, the suggestion is not actionable without defining such an exception class. The current use of IllegalArgumentException is standard and acceptable, though the suggestion has merit in terms of best practices for clarity.	4