-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update icepack #223
update icepack #223
Conversation
@apcraig, did you run the QC tests? Since the answers are changing, it would be nice to document the results from that here, now, for future reference. |
I have not run the qc tests. How does that work when all the configurations have changed answers? Do I need to run multiple configurations thru the qc? What configuration should I test? |
Good question. We should choose a test or set of tests that exercise the part of the code that changed. It looks like there have been 2 Icepack merges that were not BFB since the last update, We need to think about whether we should do other tests from the base suite for QC -- certainly that would be necessary when the changes are in parts of the code that are not exercised in the basic gx3 smoke test. Both of these changes are exercised there, so I think it should be enough for now. |
I'm working on some qc validation. Hope to have some results soon. |
Matt and I are working on the qc testing on conrad, we hit a problem. Sorry for the delay. |
I ran the QC test on the standard configuration compared to the current master and it passed. Running QC test on the following directories: |
Everything looks good to me. I'll continue working on reducing the memory footprint of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approving based on @mattdturner 's comments
Update Icepack to latest version, 0b4ee4e33 Oct 4, 2018
Developer(s): tcraig
Are the code changes bit for bit, different at roundoff level, or more substantial? NOT bit-for-bit (expected)
Does this PR create or have dependencies on Icepack or any other models? No
Is the documentation being updated with this PR? (Y/N) No
If not, does the documentation need to be updated separately at a later time? (Y/N) No
Other Relevant Details:
Test results from conrad are here, https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/Test-Results/wiki/cice_by_hash_forks, hash e6b9fee. All tests pass, but answers change, as expected.