Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zsalinity bug fix #346

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2021
Merged

zsalinity bug fix #346

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2021

Conversation

eclare108213
Copy link
Contributor

@eclare108213 eclare108213 commented Dec 30, 2020

  • Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
    Bug fix: move initialization of the array sicen into the i loop in which it is used.
  • Developer(s):
    @eclare108213
  • Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.
  • Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.

148 measured results of 148 total results
148 of 148 tests PASSED
0 of 148 tests PENDING
0 of 148 tests MISSING data
0 of 148 tests FAILED

https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/Test-Results/wiki/9c33551629.badger.intel.20-12-30.174250.0

  • How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?
    • bit for bit
    • different at roundoff level
    • more substantial
  • Does this PR create or have dependencies on CICE or any other models?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Does this PR add any new test cases?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/.)
    • Yes
    • No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
      • Yes
      • No
  • Please provide any additional information or relevant details below:

In icedrv_init_column.F90, the sicen array is set as a slice of the trcrn array for each grid cell, but that was done in a loop prior to the loop in which it is used, so only i=nx values were used. The changes to icepack_zbgc.F90 are purely cosmetic.

This does not fix the problem in cice (PR #548). There is another bug fix for that, independent of these changes (PR#549).

@eclare108213
Copy link
Contributor Author

My base_suite test came back BFB even for the zsal tests. That surprises me, and makes me wonder if there's still another bug in the zsal configuration.

@apcraig
Copy link
Contributor

apcraig commented Jan 3, 2021

Travis-ci is currently disable for us. Working on a solution. See CICE-Consortium/CICE#550

@apcraig
Copy link
Contributor

apcraig commented Jan 8, 2021

Test results on cheyenne with 4 compilers in CICE using these mods are here, https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/Test-Results/wiki/cice_by_hash_forks#dd6e38f84da340b7956dd8a10af04627a1725334

@apcraig
Copy link
Contributor

apcraig commented Jan 8, 2021

I will merge this today unless I hear otherwise.

@eclare108213
Copy link
Contributor Author

go for it, thanks

@apcraig apcraig merged commit af7e38f into CICE-Consortium:master Jan 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants