Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add extensibility to various classes #11859
Add extensibility to various classes #11859
Changes from 3 commits
062a051
2307841
f73c3de
9b5cb6e
0db26ac
ab9e341
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Strictly speaking this would be
right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this is marked as private, but typically we do add descriptions for each parameter. That applies here and throughout this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
More and more often I go down rabbit holes dug by JSDoc being old and not maintained.
object.constructor
is not a type. After a quick google search I came across this issue jsdoc/jsdoc#1349 which, paired with other JSDoc knowledge, seems to indicate there's no way to really specify "any class" as a type. The best I think we can do is specify a type of{{ constructor: function }}
to try and only accept objects with a constructor function?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
configurable: true
which then lets medelete Entity.prototype.propertyName
. But I'm not entirely sure we want to make the property fully configurable?privateName
andsubscriptionName
are not always defined so usingObject.keys
to check doesn't seem like a 100% complete solution.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussed offline: Given we'd have to jump through hoops here to make an "unsubscribe" function, we'll omit.
Depending on if we need additional Entity flexibility in the future, we could consider how the types are managed under the hood. But for the scope of this PR, its not needed.