Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft: Add GPG namespace #66

Closed

Conversation

sebastinez
Copy link

This PR proposes the implementation of the GPG namespace.

Discussion is located in #65

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Martinez <[email protected]>
CAIPs/caip-draft-gpg.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Martinez <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: ligi <[email protected]>
@bumblefudge
Copy link
Collaborator

Discussed at last meeting, leaving open pending as-yet undefined Namespaces policy on non-chain crypto systems. At this meeting, we also noted we should document better where new namespace definiions will go (/namespaces/). We also discussed the distinction between caip:gpg and caip:gpg-vks (https://keys.openpgp.org/about/api)-- how VKS could fit was discussed.

@bumblefudge
Copy link
Collaborator

Removed next meeting tag and will return to this issue after editorial namespace overhaul and discussions of non-chain boundary of this group's scope

@silverpill
Copy link

What's the status of this?
Are non-blockchain namespaces allowed?

@obstropolos
Copy link
Contributor

Doing some cleanup here - we've now moved all namespace requests to the namespaces repo. If this discussion is to continue, please reopen this in the namespaces repo: https://github.com/chainagnostic/namespaces - thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants