Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: make electra-fork passes lint and check-types #6785

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

ensi321
Copy link
Contributor

@ensi321 ensi321 commented May 15, 2024

Fixes all lint and check-types issues in electra-fork branch

@ensi321 ensi321 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 14:23
@ensi321 ensi321 merged commit 7dc2944 into electra-fork May 16, 2024
14 of 17 checks passed
@ensi321 ensi321 deleted the nc/fix-electra-ci branch May 16, 2024 08:05
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit to g11tech/lodestar that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
g11tech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
philknows pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2024
@wemeetagain
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in v1.22.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants