Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(edits): small edits + adding tokenomics back #4477

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JafarAz
Copy link
Collaborator

@JafarAz JafarAz commented Apr 8, 2024

Required for merge:

  • pr-workflow-check / draft-release-check is ✅ success
  • Other rules GitHub shows you, or can be read in configuration

Makes review faster:

  • PR title is my best effort to provide summary of changes and has clear text to be part of release notes
  • I marked PR by misc label if it should not be in release notes
  • Linked Zenhub/Github/Slack/etc reference if one exists
  • I was clear on what type of deployment required to release my changes (node, runtime, contract, indexer, on chain operation, frontend, infrastructure) if any in PR title or description
  • Added reviewer into Reviewers
  • I tagged(@) or used other form of notification of one person who I think can handle best review of this PR
  • I have proved that PR has no general regressions of relevant features and processes required to release into production
  • Any dependency updates made, was done according guides from relevant dependency
  • Clicking all checkboxes
  • Adding detailed description of changes when it feels appropriate (for example when PR is big)

@JafarAz JafarAz changed the title docs(edits): small edits + readding tokenomics for layr/mantis docs(edits): small edits + adding tokenomics back Apr 8, 2024
@rjonczy rjonczy merged commit de01c34 into main Apr 9, 2024
21 of 23 checks passed
@rjonczy rjonczy deleted the cj-docs-edits branch April 9, 2024 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants