Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented should_override_fork_choice for late block reorg #7763

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 30, 2023

Conversation

rolfyone
Copy link
Contributor

Implemented should_override_fork_choice function, and tested results via the reftests.

There's a level of duplication in the 'should_override_fork_choice' and 'get_proposer_head', but I've stayed true to the spec, while fixing ordering a little to do cheaper tests first.

Ultimately, the function will exit fast once it finds a mis-match, and if it gets to the end then things pass.

Also had to adjust timeliness to use store time, and I made the Store implement the TimeProvider to fix an issue with using a system time provider when store time was needed.

Finally, while I did successfully run the reftests, I have to leave the reftests disabled until we get a release that doesnt contain backwards ticks. It's possible to remove the ticks to run the tests, but they won't run out of the box.

partially addresses #6595

Documentation

  • I thought about documentation and added the doc-change-required label to this PR if updates are required.

Changelog

  • I thought about adding a changelog entry, and added one if I deemed necessary.

Implemented should_override_fork_choice function, and tested results via the reftests.

There's a level of duplication in the 'should_override_fork_choice' and 'get_proposer_head', but I've stayed true to the spec, while fixing ordering a little to do cheaper tests first.

Ultimately, the function will exit fast once it finds a mis-match, and if it gets to the end then things pass.

Also had to adjust timeliness to use store time, and I made the Store implement the TimeProvider to fix an issue with using a system time provider when store time was needed.

Finally, while I did successfully run the reftests, I have to leave the reftests disabled until we get a release that doesnt contain backwards ticks. It's possible to remove the ticks to run the tests, but they won't run out of the box.

partially addresses Consensys#6595

Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
@rolfyone rolfyone merged commit cac13fa into Consensys:master Nov 30, 2023
15 checks passed
@rolfyone rolfyone deleted the 6595-shouldOverrideForkChoice branch November 30, 2023 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants