Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request to fix (#117), user cannot sign out during create_profile sec… #118

Closed

Conversation

ericpb
Copy link

@ericpb ericpb commented Aug 13, 2024

Request to fix (#117), user cannot sign out during create_profile section

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the sign-out process by implementing a secure POST request instead of a GET request, improving user experience and security.
    • Introduced a server-side action for signing out users, ensuring proper session management and redirection after logout.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues related to the previous sign-out implementation, ensuring it adheres to best practices for state-changing operations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the sign-out functionality in the Svelte application. The implementation now uses a form with a POST method for logging out users, replacing the previous anchor tag approach. This update ensures a more secure and robust handling of authentication state transitions, providing a better user experience by adhering to best practices.

Changes

Files and Directories Change Summary
src/routes/(admin)/account/create_profile/+page.svelte Replaced sign-out anchor tag with a form using POST method for improved security and state management.
src/routes/(admin)/account/sign_out/+page.server.ts Introduced server-side actions for signing out users, handling session retrieval and redirection post logout.

Poem

In the meadow where rabbits leap,
A change was made, oh what a treat!
With forms to sign out, clear and bright,
We bounce away, our hearts take flight!
Hopping safe, with joy to share,
Login woes vanish into thin air! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f0d0516 and cabfc63.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/routes/(admin)/account/create_profile/+page.svelte (1 hunks)
  • src/routes/(admin)/account/sign_out/+page.server.ts (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +4 to +9
default: async ({ locals: { supabase, safeGetSession } }) => {
const { session } = await safeGetSession()
if (session) {
await supabase.auth.signOut()
}
redirect(303, "/")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add error handling for the sign-out operation.

Currently, the signOut operation does not handle potential errors. Consider adding error handling to ensure robustness.

export const actions = {
  default: async ({ locals: { supabase, safeGetSession } }) => {
    const { session } = await safeGetSession()
    if (session) {
      try {
        await supabase.auth.signOut()
      } catch (error) {
        console.error("Error signing out:", error)
        // Optionally, handle the error by redirecting to an error page or displaying a message
      }
    }
    redirect(303, "/")
  },
}

Comment on lines +116 to +118
<form action="/account/sign_out" method="POST">
<button type="submit" class="underline">Sign out</button>
</form>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Aug 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good implementation of sign-out using a form.

The use of a form with a POST method for signing out aligns with best practices. Ensure that any errors during form submission are handled and communicated to the user.

<form action="/account/sign_out" method="POST">
  <button type="submit" class="underline">Sign out</button>
  <!-- Consider adding error handling for the form submission -->
</form>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can just use the sign out link format we use elsewhere:

<a href="/account/sign_out" class="link">Sign Out</a>

No need to add a new endpoint.

POST does make sense, but don't want to fragment it and have a mix of methods across the template.

Sounds good?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@scosman, that makes sense. Consistency across the application is important, and using the same sign-out link format helps maintain that. Reverting to the anchor tag format as used elsewhere is a good approach. Let me know if there's anything else you'd like to adjust!

Copy link
Author

@ericpb ericpb Aug 14, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand the preference for consistency. However the current approach of using
<a href="/account/sign_out" class="link">Sign Out</a>
is not working on the create_profile page. I think due to the differences in how SvelteKit handles page navigation between layouts and individual pages.
I'm quite new to SvelteKit and this template so I could be wrong; happy to discuss further.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!

Comment on lines +116 to +118
<form action="/account/sign_out" method="POST">
<button type="submit" class="underline">Sign out</button>
</form>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can just use the sign out link format we use elsewhere:

<a href="/account/sign_out" class="link">Sign Out</a>

No need to add a new endpoint.

POST does make sense, but don't want to fragment it and have a mix of methods across the template.

Sounds good?

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
import { redirect } from "@sveltejs/kit"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can just delete this change (see above comment)

@scosman
Copy link
Contributor

scosman commented Aug 15, 2024

Thanks for the bug report @ericpb

You were totally right. Made a smaller fix here to let the standard sign out path work: f280d59

@scosman scosman closed this Aug 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants