-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for issue #3217 regarding template search feature #3218
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
doesn't that
)
belong at the end of the SQL Heredoc? Like this:If rubocop isn't happy with it, maybe set the SQL to a variable and then do
.joins(my_var)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh interesting... I copied the format from examples on line number 137 and 150 in the same file. I tried making the change you suggested (i.e. moving the
)
)locally and it seems to mess up the formatting (for the entire file) 🤔I'm hoping that since the current format has been used in the past, has now passed rubocop checks and works..then maybe it can stay the same? Let me know what you think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh weird ok. If it works then I'm happy.
Typically with heredoc, anything after the
<<~SQL ... SQL
becomes part of the text. Maybe the)
is required to close out the prior part of the SQL statement that ActiveRecord is generating behind the scenes.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It definitely works, but John just mentioned that he would prefer the second suggestion you made which is to store the SQL part in a var and do
.joins(var)
,as that it more clear. So I might make those changes and push it again. Will keep you posted.We should then change the format of the other two scopes as well I'm guessing, so that they are all of the same format (?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, if it works. If not leave it as is