Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add SPDM 1.3 new feature: Set key pair info #2803

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Wenxing-hou
Copy link
Contributor

@Wenxing-hou Wenxing-hou commented Aug 15, 2024

The PR is pure set_key_pair_info feature now.

@Wenxing-hou Wenxing-hou marked this pull request as draft August 15, 2024 09:36
@Wenxing-hou Wenxing-hou force-pushed the set_key_pair branch 3 times, most recently from 5dc3975 to 74c855e Compare August 16, 2024 08:04
@Wenxing-hou Wenxing-hou marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2024 08:04
@Wenxing-hou Wenxing-hou force-pushed the set_key_pair branch 2 times, most recently from 5d68bf3 to 94893e1 Compare August 20, 2024 12:19
@steven-bellock
Copy link
Contributor

@Wenxing-hou Wenxing-hou force-pushed the set_key_pair branch 2 times, most recently from 4627477 to 40febd1 Compare August 21, 2024 06:34
It is integrator's responsibility to ensure GET_KEY_PAIR_INFO_CAP is set,
if SET_KEY_PAIR_INFO_CAP is set.

Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]>
@jyao1
Copy link
Member

jyao1 commented Sep 4, 2024

@steven-bellock , could you please give all comment one time, instead of one by one?

@steven-bellock
Copy link
Contributor

@jyao1 I am done with the review.

Copy link
Contributor

@steven-bellock steven-bellock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is @Xiaohanjlll going to write some unit tests? Or should I do that?

@jyao1 jyao1 merged commit 2634426 into DMTF:main Sep 12, 2024
97 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants