-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(admission controller): fix unit test data race #30899
fix(admission controller): fix unit test data race #30899
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Wassim DHIF <[email protected]>
[Fast Unit Tests Report] On pipeline 48552955 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests: Jobs:
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=48552955 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit be24b50 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 03abf3c Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.38 | [+0.34, +0.43] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.38 | [+0.33, +0.43] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.36, +0.37] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.26, +0.25] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.12, +0.11] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.23, +0.16] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.29, +0.20] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.33 | [-0.45, -0.20] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.36 | [-0.84, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.42 | [-1.15, +0.31] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.49 | [-0.59, -0.39] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | -0.68 | [-4.12, +2.75] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -0.90 | [-4.65, +2.85] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 6/10 | |
❌ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 6/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
❌ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 8/10 | |
❌ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 8/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
What does this PR do?
Fixes data races that can happen when trying to set both
c.config.validationEnabled
andc.config.mutationEnabled
totrue
. Setting them is not needed as both those config variables defaults totrue
.With the following error:
We can see that the values are read on those lines:
datadog-agent/pkg/clusteragent/admission/controllers/webhook/controller_v1.go
Lines 122 to 127 in d928968
But at the same time in the unit test, right after starting the controller, we have the following lines:
datadog-agent/pkg/clusteragent/admission/controllers/webhook/controller_v1_test.go
Lines 148 to 149 in d928968
Meaning that it could happen that the variables are being set at the same time when it is being read from the
Run()
method, causing the Data Race Detector to flag the test as failing.As those lines are not needed, we might as well remove them.
Motivation
Fixes data race to avoid unit tests flakiness.
Describe how to test/QA your changes
N/A
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
N/A