Fix: use Java 11 bytecode for public modules

[0xnm]

What does this PR do?

I noticed that some public modules were inconsistent in terms of the Java bytecode version produced, they had Java 17. Fixing it to align with other modules, to use Java 11.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Make sure you discussed the feature or bugfix with the maintaining team in an Issue
• Make sure each commit and the PR mention the Issue number (cf the CONTRIBUTING doc)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.36%. Comparing base (d9b0432) to head (064f219).
Report is 6 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2315      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    70.32%   70.36%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          736      736              
  Lines        27465    27466       +1     
  Branches      4607     4607              
===========================================
+ Hits         19313    19325      +12     
+ Misses        6863     6856       -7     
+ Partials      1289     1285       -4     

see 30 files with indirect coverage changes