Add crashtracker

[iamluc]

Description

Need DataDog/libdatadog#535

Reviewer checklist

• Test coverage seems ok.
• Appropriate labels assigned.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.97%. Comparing base (81a708f) to head (3738163).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (81a708f) and HEAD (3738163). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (81a708f)	HEAD (3738163)
tracer-php	12	11

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2763      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     81.07%   73.97%   -7.10%     
  Complexity     2516     2516              
============================================
  Files           146      173      +27     
  Lines         14650    18679    +4029     
  Branches          0      975     +975     
============================================
+ Hits          11877    13818    +1941     
- Misses         2773     4324    +1551     
- Partials          0      537     +537     

Flag	Coverage Δ
appsec-extension	69.12% <ø> (?)
tracer-extension	78.19% <ø> (ø)
tracer-php	74.10% <ø> (-8.18%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 36 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 81a708f...3738163. Read the comment docs.

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-08-20 08:30:06

Comparing candidate commit b8098a9 in PR branch luc/crashtracker with baseline commit d75a84d in branch master.

Found 14 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 164 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:EmptyFileBench/benchEmptyFileBaseline

• 🟩 execution_time [-515.368µs; -339.932µs] or [-17.893%; -11.802%]

scenario:EmptyFileBench/benchEmptyFileBaseline-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-515.619µs; -314.081µs] or [-17.205%; -10.480%]

scenario:EmptyFileBench/benchEmptyFileOverhead

• 🟩 execution_time [-614.655µs; -418.865µs] or [-18.923%; -12.896%]

scenario:EmptyFileBench/benchEmptyFileOverhead-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-605.577µs; -435.963µs] or [-18.270%; -13.153%]

scenario:LaravelBench/benchLaravelBaseline

• 🟩 execution_time [-492.131µs; -300.629µs] or [-16.307%; -9.961%]

scenario:LaravelBench/benchLaravelBaseline-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-484.379µs; -262.801µs] or [-15.599%; -8.463%]

scenario:LaravelBench/benchLaravelOverhead

• 🟩 execution_time [-543.879µs; -379.681µs] or [-16.210%; -11.316%]

scenario:LaravelBench/benchLaravelOverhead-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-621.550µs; -436.310µs] or [-17.636%; -12.380%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyBaseline

• 🟩 execution_time [-406.953µs; -361.167µs] or [-6.862%; -6.090%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyBaseline-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-375.610µs; -323.290µs] or [-6.224%; -5.357%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyOverhead

• 🟩 execution_time [-847.056µs; -766.524µs] or [-12.278%; -11.111%]

scenario:SymfonyBench/benchSymfonyOverhead-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-805.494µs; -729.406µs] or [-11.508%; -10.421%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressOverhead

• 🟩 execution_time [-10.477ms; -8.417ms] or [-4.908%; -3.943%]

scenario:WordPressBench/benchWordPressOverhead-opcache

• 🟩 execution_time [-11.201ms; -7.988ms] or [-5.232%; -3.732%]

[bwoebi]

Is this for this test or does alpine generally not support crashtracking?

[bwoebi]

Ready for merge!