-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 890
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
force close on peer with "internal error" no further explanations #5102
Comments
The channel closed because the peer returned an error message. The received ERROR is the hint here, everything after this is provided by the peer's implementation.
'Unable to read message' seems like a good hint. Typically Edited. |
I ran into a few more like this and I caught a good one with c-otto which he described it here: lightningnetwork/lnd#6485 |
I ran into this one, it's my 2nd time, lightningnetwork/lnd#6564 . This one is interesting though as LND cannot read something that we sent and eventually the "internal error" was fired. Devs on both side should work together |
Just an update. I ran into something similar with @ZoltanAB lightningnetwork/lnd#6593 It feels like LND is sending |
This wouldn't be the first time. LND hands out |
#5326 should fix this? |
I think we can close this one. Running the fix right now. Will open a new issue in case something like this happens again. |
Issue and Steps to Reproduce
It's been the 4th time this happened. This time I was able to coordinate with my LND peer and I have more detail to share. The force close happened when I was doing maintenace on the machine, a couple restart on c-lightning in the low traffic time.
In my log:
on his log:
Nothing really stands out in his log. There are several "unable to read message" and "read handler closed", before and after the incidence
getinfo
outputWhen it happened I was still running with
lightningd v0.10.2-262-g1087f9a-modded
Now I just upgraded to
lightningd v0.10.2-456-ga2a6b8c
In the hope that the issue has been fixed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: