typo fix

contributed_definitions/NXcoordinate_system_set.nxdl.xml

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
            This :ref:`NXcoordinate_system_set` should define at least one NXcoordinate_system
            instance. This shall be named such that it is clear how this coordinate system is
            typically referred to in a community. For the NeXus `McStas coordinate system, it is
-           adviused to call it mcstas for the sake of improved clarity.
+           advised to call it mcstas for the sake of improved clarity.
            Additional NXcoordinate_system instances should be specified if possible in that same
            :ref:`NXcoordinate_system_set` instead of cluttering them across the tree.
 
@@ -118,5 +118,5 @@ Depends on cardinality of NXcoordinate_system_set, i.e. how many NXcoordinate_sy
 - 0, the root of an NXtransformation chain i.e. "." means McStas
 - 1, the root of an NXtransformation chain i.e. "." means "that specific CS" i.e. the one defined by the single instance of NXcoordinate_system in the set
 - > 1, "." becomes ambiguous. My suggestion, spell out the name of the specific NXcoordinate_system instance to be used, using "."
-  despite all these, a warning should be raised, like a logic warning (and McStas kick in) or an error (i.e. be forbidden) be raised-->
+despite all these, a warning should be raised, like a logic warning (and McStas kick in) or an error (i.e. be forbidden) be raised-->
 </definition>

contributed_definitions/nyaml/NXcoordinate_system_set.yaml

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ doc: |
     This :ref:`NXcoordinate_system_set` should define at least one NXcoordinate_system
     instance. This shall be named such that it is clear how this coordinate system is
     typically referred to in a community. For the NeXus `McStas coordinate system, it is
-    adviused to call it mcstas for the sake of improved clarity.
+    advised to call it mcstas for the sake of improved clarity.
     Additional NXcoordinate_system instances should be specified if possible in that same
     :ref:`NXcoordinate_system_set` instead of cluttering them across the tree.
     
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ NXcoordinate_system_set(NXobject):
   # despite all these, a warning should be raised, like a logic warning (and McStas kick in) or an error (i.e. be forbidden) be raised
 
 # ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ SHA HASH ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-# 19dcdaa81b00c7163aed10d5e3a9fd6393f681c1df3bf0b79af8db1e9f8e746e
+# 2c012af7dc8e09a7f7df9408a0d04886f58bc74feff6fc207658954ad8682422
 # <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
 # <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="nxdlformat.xsl"?>
 # <!--
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ NXcoordinate_system_set(NXobject):
 #            This :ref:`NXcoordinate_system_set` should define at least one NXcoordinate_system
 #            instance. This shall be named such that it is clear how this coordinate system is
 #            typically referred to in a community. For the NeXus `McStas coordinate system, it is
-#            adviused to call it mcstas for the sake of improved clarity.
+#            advised to call it mcstas for the sake of improved clarity.
 #            Additional NXcoordinate_system instances should be specified if possible in that same
 #            :ref:`NXcoordinate_system_set` instead of cluttering them across the tree.
 #            
@@ -221,5 +221,5 @@ NXcoordinate_system_set(NXobject):
 # - 0, the root of an NXtransformation chain i.e. "." means McStas
 # - 1, the root of an NXtransformation chain i.e. "." means "that specific CS" i.e. the one defined by the single instance of NXcoordinate_system in the set
 # - > 1, "." becomes ambiguous. My suggestion, spell out the name of the specific NXcoordinate_system instance to be used, using "."
-#   despite all these, a warning should be raised, like a logic warning (and McStas kick in) or an error (i.e. be forbidden) be raised-->
+# despite all these, a warning should be raised, like a logic warning (and McStas kick in) or an error (i.e. be forbidden) be raised-->
 # </definition>