-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf: improve performance and modify some abci #287
Conversation
|
* chore: use default db backend among the available ones * chore: bump up iavl, tm-db
* fix: error handling after check tx * fix: typo * chore: (mempool) remove postCheck and impl reserve * chore: fix tests * chore: revise log (remove checkTx.Code) * chore: add `CONTRACT` for `mem.proxyAppConn.CheckTxAsync()` * chore: revise numTxs, txsBytes for `ErrMempoolIsFull` in reserve() * chore: revise to remove redundant `isFull()` * fix: remove tx from cache when `app errors` or `failed to reserve` * Revert "chore: revise to remove redundant `isFull()`" This reverts commit 55990ec.
…schia#219) * fix: revise to call Begin/EndRecheck even though `mem.Size()` is 0 * chore: revise local_client.go * fix: lint error * chore: recheckTxs() just return if mem.Size() == 0
* feat: impl checkTxAsyncReactor() (Finschia#168) * fix: tests * fix: lint errors
…a#226) * chore: revise abci.Client, Async() interfaces * chore: regen mock w/ mockery 2.7.4 * fix: lint error * fix: test_race * mempool.Flush() flushes all txs from mempool so it should get `Lock()` instead of `RLock()`
* chore: remove iavl dependency * chore: fix lint error
The build tag makes disable go implementation of secp256k1. Cause there is no C implementation, a build error will occur when using tag `libsecp256k1`.
* perf: optimize checking the txs size * ci: add GOPRIVATE to workflows * test: add a unit test * fix: fix lint errors
* perf: do not flush wal when receive consensus msgs
776ea2e
to
50cffac
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #287 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 61.18% 62.65% +1.47%
==========================================
Files 272 272
Lines 29988 30166 +178
==========================================
+ Hits 18347 18900 +553
+ Misses 9963 9546 -417
- Partials 1678 1720 +42
|
DurationCommitRechecking: discard.NewHistogram(), | ||
DurationWaitingForNewRound: discard.NewHistogram(), | ||
|
||
DurationGaugeProposal: discard.NewGauge(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About variable name: Why is Gauge
added only to variable names whose type is Gauge? For example, it doesn't seem to be attached to Histgram type variables.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are DurationProposal
and DurationGaugeProposal
. Grafana
needs a histogram, and Gauge is comfortable when investigating in person, so I put both.
Namespace: namespace, | ||
Subsystem: MetricsSubsystem, | ||
Name: "duration_proposal_block_receiving", | ||
Help: "Duration of receiving all proposal block parts", | ||
Name: "duration_commit_committing", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About variable names: Looking at the original code, it seems good to compose it with the words that explain Help. Isn't it duration_committing_updated_state
instead of duration_commit_committing
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry but this is hard to change. Grafana
is using this name. This is what happened when I made the name more hierarchical.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where is the name used in Grafana?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! I dont know user name and password ^^;.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
I bound each commit hash and corresponding PR of ebony branch.
50cffac
#273
162c63c
#264
ceec05b
#256
1a500f9
#246
720052e
#229
0ed36c7
#226 fix
1413661
#228
e47f13d
#226
4417941
#225
7da95d6
#224
94c8980
#223
1221fe7
#221
05becb8
#219
800cab3
#217
7ea6e35
"tendermint -> ostracon"
39067a6
#213, key name
5c8e180
#213, TM->OC
877e670
#213, modify tm-db interface
04c5f31
#212
dce3c03
#201
1cf27a5
"fix: use line/tm-db instead of tendermint/tm-db"
727f843
#199
208ceef
#199
Please add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review.
Closes: #XXX