-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CHAT-1471] Allowed/blocked file extensions and content types #582
Conversation
Size Change: 0 B Total Size: 214 kB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
src/types.ts
Outdated
@@ -1251,12 +1253,24 @@ export type AppSettings = { | |||
disable_auth_checks?: boolean; | |||
disable_permissions_checks?: boolean; | |||
enforce_unique_usernames?: 'no' | 'app' | 'team'; | |||
file_upload_config?: { | |||
allowed_file_extensions?: string[]; | |||
allowed_mime_types?: string[]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to confirm, do we have some exhaustive list of all these types/extensions? @miagilepner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't. We could make an exhaustive list (e.g. for the media types the full list is here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml) and do validation, if you think this should be prioritized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not necessary tbh. If backend is prepared to handle any wierd type ... then its totally fine!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's put a comment in here with the link to the accepted types
Co-authored-by: Vishal Narkhede <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lets wait for @nhannah 's review as well :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (for tests)
@@ -1460,6 +1475,13 @@ export type Field = { | |||
value?: string; | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
export type FileUploadConfig = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why don't we use this type above ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
was following the way that it's done for other objects, which repeat fields rather than using the type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any example for a reference ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, you're right. I thought firebase_config and apn_config did this, but I see now they have slightly different fields in AppSettings. I'll fix that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, they are different slightly but here is exactly same. Thanks for updating.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Submit a pull request
CLA
Description of the pull request