Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core(fr): add lighthouseMarker timeOrigin support #12688

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 24, 2021

Conversation

patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary
Implements the lighthouse marker time origin support needed to activate the audits relying on traces in timespan mode. This doesn't actually enable any audits to run yet, but that next phase ballooned the PR a bit, so thought I would focus on time origin support first.

Related Issues/PRs
ref #11313
ref #12595

@patrickhulce patrickhulce requested a review from a team as a code owner June 23, 2021 22:35
@patrickhulce patrickhulce requested review from adamraine and removed request for a team June 23, 2021 22:35
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Jun 23, 2021
demo.js Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
'use strict';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We've added demo puppeteer scripts to a bunch of PRs now. At some point we should start converting our demos into smoke tests.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should start thinking about our approach to more comprehensive integration tests as we expand audit cases 👍

At least in most of my cases though, that doesn't solve my problem since I need the CLI to support a --fraggle-rock mode, I just want to look through the report :) That's on the radar as well.

@patrickhulce patrickhulce merged commit 0de46e7 into master Jun 24, 2021
@patrickhulce patrickhulce deleted the fr_lh_marker_time_origin branch June 24, 2021 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants