-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Perform deprecation of GKE subnetwork creation #2562
Perform deprecation of GKE subnetwork creation #2562
Conversation
Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules. Pull request statusesNo diff detected in terraform-google-conversion. New Pull RequestsI built this PR into one or more new PRs on other repositories, and when those are closed, this PR will also be merged and closed. |
Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules. Pull request statusesWARNING: The following files changed in commit 0420626 may need corresponding changes in third_party/validator:
terraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR. New Pull RequestsI didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR. |
Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules. Pull request statusesterraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR. New Pull RequestsI didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR. |
Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules. Pull request statusesWARNING: The following files changed in commit f140d8c may need corresponding changes in third_party/validator:
terraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR. New Pull RequestsI didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR. |
@@ -1344,6 +1344,15 @@ func TestAccContainerCluster_withIPAllocationPolicy_createSubnetwork(t *testing. | |||
ImportState: true, | |||
ImportStateVerify: true, | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
Config: testAccContainerCluster_withIPAllocationPolicy_createSubnetworkUpdated(cluster), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From what I can tell, this test is to confirm that you can move things out of the old block and set it by using the subnetwork
field. Would a PlanOnly
test make more sense here (to check a lack of diffs), or are we expecting the change to actually perform an update? Also if I'm way off the mark, a comment explaining the purpose of the test would be appreciated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You got it right- I'd forgotten that PlanOnly
was a thing.
third_party/terraform/website/docs/version_3_upgrade.html.markdown
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
third_party/terraform/website/docs/version_3_upgrade.html.markdown
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules. Pull request statusesterraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR. New Pull RequestsI didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR. |
third_party/terraform/tests/resource_container_cluster_test.go.erb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
}, | ||
{ | ||
ResourceName: "google_container_cluster.with_ip_allocation_policy", | ||
ResourceName: "google_container_cluster.with_ip_allocation_policy", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we still want this import step given that the previous was planonly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤷♀ it's probably entirely redundant, but import is free and running ISV another time is nice.
Hi! I'm the modular magician, I work on Magic Modules. Pull request statusesterraform-provider-google-beta already has an open PR. New Pull RequestsI didn't open any new pull requests because of this PR. |
Tracked submodules are build/terraform-beta build/terraform-mapper build/terraform build/ansible build/inspec.
2613362
to
838af0c
Compare
Part of hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#4638
Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)