Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

handle case where bigtable development instances have one node #3057

Conversation

danawillow
Copy link
Contributor

@danawillow danawillow commented Jan 31, 2020

The API still doesn't permit setting the node count for development instances, but if we send it as empty it might return 0 or 1 back. Unfortunately, customizediff can't tell that the field isn't set in the config if it is set in state (regardless of whether it's set to computed), so we have to have it allow 1 as a value for num_nodes even though it'll fail at apply-time.

Fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#5492.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

bigtable: fixed diff for DEVELOPMENT instances that are returned from the API with one node

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff
Terraform Beta: Diff

Copy link
Member

@rileykarson rileykarson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems safe enough as a workaround for now. LGTM. Can you amend the changelog for our current release to include a known issue indicating that BT may set num_nodes for DEVELOPMENT instances?

@danawillow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good idea, done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

google_bigtable_instance force replacement of development instance_type
4 participants