Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upstream GKE scopes description #4101

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 14, 2020

Conversation

slevenick
Copy link
Contributor

Upstreams hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#7441

Downstream PR:

The oauth_scopes section of google_container_cluster has generated a lot of confusion since GCP no longer uses access scopes. The best practice is to use the https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform scope and constrain permissions at the service account level. As currently documented, the examples guide the developer down the path of using legacy access scopes. This PR updates the documentation with the recommended configuration.

Related: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#1962, hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#1817, hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#7391

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Generated Terraform, and ran make test and make lint to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)


The `oauth_scopes` section of `google_container_cluster` has generated a lot of confusion since GCP [no longer uses access scopes](https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/access-scopes). The [best practice](https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/access/create-enable-service-accounts-for-instances#best_practices) is to use the `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform` scope and constrain permissions at the service account level. As currently documented, the examples guide the developer down the path of using legacy access scopes. This PR updates the documentation with the recommended configuration.

Related: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#1962, hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#1817, hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#7391
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Oct 13, 2020

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: no label Oct 13, 2020
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests based on this PR's diffs. See the results here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=151985"

@slevenick
Copy link
Contributor Author

/gcbrun

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests based on this PR's diffs. See the results here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=152159"

Copy link
Member

@rileykarson rileykarson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This covers auto_provisioning_defaults.oauth_scopes but not the more-often-used one node_config.oauth_scopes. You can probably change that one upstream and let the Magician work out the diff.

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Oct 14, 2020

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests based on this PR's diffs. See the results here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=152168"

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests in RECORDING mode for the following tests that failed during VCR: TestAccProviderMeta_setModuleName You can view the result here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=152169"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants