Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for available_secrets to google_cloudbuild_trigger #4977

Conversation

cgroschupp
Copy link
Contributor

@cgroschupp cgroschupp commented Jul 19, 2021

add support for available_secrets to google_cloudbuild_trigger.
https://cloud.google.com/build/docs/api/reference/rest/v1/projects.builds#secrets

fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#8808

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Generated Terraform, and ran make test and make lint to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

cloudbuild: added support for available_secrets to google_cloudbuild_trigger

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Jul 19, 2021

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: no label Jul 19, 2021
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello! I am a robot who works on Magic Modules PRs.

I have detected that you are a community contributor, so your PR will be assigned to someone with a commit-bit on this repo for initial review.

Thanks for your contribution! A human will be with you soon.

@rileykarson, please review this PR or find an appropriate assignee.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
Ansible: Diff ( 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+))
TF OiCS: Diff ( 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-))
Inspec: Diff ( 5 files changed, 95 insertions(+))

1 similar comment
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
Ansible: Diff ( 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+))
TF OiCS: Diff ( 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-))
Inspec: Diff ( 5 files changed, 95 insertions(+))

@cgroschupp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rileykarson Can you please look over this pr.

@rileykarson
Copy link
Member

Sorry about that, I must have accidentally dismissed the notification! I've been a bit underwater on my email.

The test passes as-is, but given that the field supports update let's add an update test as well. https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules/blob/master/mmv1/third_party/terraform/tests/resource_cloudbuild_trigger_test.go is a good file to reference- typically the most interesting test is to start with the value set, and then remove it eg:

    available_secrets {
      secret_manager {
        env          = "MY_SECRET"
        version_name = "projects/myProject/secrets/mySecret/versions/latest"
      }
    }

to

# intentionally blank

@cgroschupp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rileykarson ok, thanks for the hint. is it ok to add this to TestAccCloudBuildTrigger_basic test?

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 4 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 6 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+))
TF OiCS: Diff ( 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-))

@msuarezd
Copy link

msuarezd commented Sep 8, 2021

Hi @rileykarson, any news on this? It would be really helpful for us to get this merged.

@rileykarson
Copy link
Member

Sorry, still super behind on email!

@cgroschupp: Would you mind adding a new case? We tend to try and keep _basic ones to a small set of core-to-the-resource fields, and this one is pretty additive.

@cgroschupp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rileykarson I have updated the tests.

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 4 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 5 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+))
TF OiCS: Diff ( 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-))

@franzs
Copy link
Contributor

franzs commented Oct 20, 2021

@rileykarson Sorry for bothering you. Is there any time frame we can expect a review? We are desperately waiting for this feature.
🙏

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 4 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 4 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+))
TF Validator: Diff ( 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+))
TF OiCS: Diff ( 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-))

@franzs
Copy link
Contributor

franzs commented Nov 26, 2021

@rileykarson Meanwhile the feature branch was updated to match the upstream by @cgroschupp.
Could you please have a look at the PR again?

@rileykarson
Copy link
Member

Sorry about the delay! Code LGTM on a first pass, running tests. These are VCR tests that work by replaying old API results- we expect the new tests (and some random unrelated ones) to fail on a first pass as they aren't recorded, I need to inspect the RECORDING results.

/gcbrun

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 5 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 4 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+))
TF Validator: Diff ( 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+))
TF OiCS: Diff ( 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests in RECORDING mode for the following tests that failed during VCR: TestAccApigeeEnvironmentIamBindingGenerated|TestAccApigeeEnvironmentIamMemberGenerated|TestAccApigeeEnvironmentIamPolicyGenerated|TestAccCloudBuildTrigger_cloudbuildTriggerBuildExample|TestAccCloudBuildTrigger_available_secrets_config|TestAccCloudFunctionsFunction_vpcConnector|TestAccComputeRegionNetworkEndpointGroup_regionNetworkEndpointGroupAppengineExample You can view the result here: https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=227591

@franzs
Copy link
Contributor

franzs commented Dec 8, 2021

@rileykarson Thanks a lot. 🎊

betsy-lichtenberg pushed a commit to betsy-lichtenberg/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SecretManager for cloud build
5 participants