-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add disk.provisioned_iops to compute_instance_template #8528
Conversation
1fb24f6
to
86f8786
Compare
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)) |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)) |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccComputeRegionInstanceTemplate_diskIops|TestAccComputeInstanceTemplate_diskIops |
Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues$\textcolor{green}{\textsf{All tests passed!}} |
Note for the reviewer: I found a |
Per conversation with the team, I've added the new field to |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)) Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_compute_instance_template" "primary" {
disk {
provisioned_iops = # value needed
}
}
Resource: resource "google_compute_region_instance_template" "primary" {
disk {
provisioned_iops = # value needed
}
}
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 4 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccBigQueryDataTable_bigtable|TestAccBigtableAppProfile_bigtableAppProfileMulticlusterExample|TestAccBigtableAppProfile_bigtableAppProfileSingleclusterExample|TestAccBigtableAppProfile_bigtableAppProfileAnyclusterExample |
Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues
|
834bba5
to
869a193
Compare
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)) Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_compute_instance_template" "primary" {
disk {
provisioned_iops = # value needed
}
}
Resource: resource "google_compute_region_instance_template" "primary" {
disk {
provisioned_iops = # value needed
}
}
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests:
|
…atform#8528) * Add disk.provisioned_iops to compute_instance_template * Add to region template as well * Add provisioned_iops to disk characteristics that are used for array ordering
…atform#8528) * Add disk.provisioned_iops to compute_instance_template * Add to region template as well * Add provisioned_iops to disk characteristics that are used for array ordering
…atform#8528) * Add disk.provisioned_iops to compute_instance_template * Add to region template as well * Add provisioned_iops to disk characteristics that are used for array ordering
…atform#8528) * Add disk.provisioned_iops to compute_instance_template * Add to region template as well * Add provisioned_iops to disk characteristics that are used for array ordering
Fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#14858
This allows
provisioned_iops
to be set on a disk directly within acompute_instance_template
, instead of needing to specify it on a separate disk resource.Since they reuse the same functions, I also updated
compute_region_instance_template
to include this field, which seems like an appropriate change anyway.If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:
make test
andmake lint
in the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)