Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hdf5 1 14 5 update #4895

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024
Merged

Hdf5 1 14 5 update #4895

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

lrknox
Copy link
Collaborator

@lrknox lrknox commented Sep 28, 2024

No description provided.

fortnern and others added 7 commits September 19, 2024 13:56
In H5F__accum_reset(), when H5F__accum_flush() failed, the freeing of
f_sh->accum.buf was never reached, causing resource leak.

@fortnern added the third argument to H5F__accum_reset() so we can free
f_sh->accum.buf when we close the file, that is, when H5F__accum_reset()
is called from the H5F__dest() route, and can leave the accumulator in place
otherwise.
H5LTfind_dataset() returns true for non-existing datasets because it only compares up to the length of the searched string, such as "Day" vs "DayNight" (issue HDFGroupGH-4780).

This PR applied the user's patch and added tests.
Incremented version subrelease to -3.
@lrknox lrknox added Priority - 0. Blocker ⛔ This MUST be merged for the release to happen Type - Task Actions that don't fit into any other type category Component - Misc Anything else (CODEOWNERS, etc.) labels Sep 28, 2024
Linux 5.16.14-200.fc35 GNU gcc (GCC) 11.2.1 20220127 (Red Hat 11.2.1-9)
#1 SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.2.1 20220127 (Red Hat 11.2.1-9)
Fedora35 clang version 13.0.0 (Fedora 13.0.0-3.fc35)
- HDF5 is tested with the two latest macOS versions that are available
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought you'd change it for all OSs?

@lrknox lrknox merged commit 72f0f30 into HDFGroup:hdf5_1_14_5 Sep 28, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component - Misc Anything else (CODEOWNERS, etc.) Priority - 0. Blocker ⛔ This MUST be merged for the release to happen Type - Task Actions that don't fit into any other type category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants