You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
## Summary
Fixes#1985
### Time to review: __2 mins__
## Changes proposed
When handling transformations of booleans, allow `Yes` and `No` as valid
values in addition to `Y` and `N`.
## Context for reviewers
These new values are immensely uncommon, but there are a few rare
occurrences of them. Easier to just support them than work around in any
other way.
## Additional information
For example, in `TSYNOPSIS_HIST`, the count of values for the
cost_sharing bool:
```
No 971
N 60820
Y 13723
Yes 581
```
The non-history table does not have this value.
Summary
Its incredibly uncommon, but some very old data in the Oracle system stores booleans as the strings Yes/No instead of Y/N.
We should just consider those truthy as well.
Acceptance criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: