Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
M10.0 v1.7.5 reorder entropy for uncertainty #75
M10.0 v1.7.5 reorder entropy for uncertainty #75
Changes from all commits
a95313c
d335871
212b8a2
87bdf75
833ec7b
9b6c8da
9ba7679
4983f45
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On ne passe dans cette ligne (return self.codes.detailed.both_unsure) que si on est à "not high_entropy", je suggère de la passer dans le bloc "if" correspondant, en ligne 365.
Eventuellement en plus, en traitant le cas "high entropy" en premier et en finissant sur le bloc "if not high_entropy" il est possible de supprimer la ligne du "if", puisqu'on est sorti de la méthode en cas de "high entrpoy" just avant. Cela fait une indentation de moins dans un bloc qui en a beaucoup (c'est juste une question de lisibilité)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On y passe si on n'est pas high entropy, mais on laisse tout de même la possibilité de passer par la BDUni avant, donc impossible de mettre ce return dans le premier bloc.
C'est un peu complexe en l'était mais je ne vois pas vraiment comment simpliifer, à part en se passant totalement de l'entropie. Ca ne me semble pas forcément souhaitable, puisque lorsqu'elle a été ajoutée c'est qu'elle conduisait à une amélioration...