♻️ refactor project access rights 🗃️🚨

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• ♻️ Refactor project access rights (New table project_to_groups was created 🗃️)
• Highlights:
  • When you interact with project access rights new endpoints must be used:
    • POST /projects/<project-id>/groups/<group-id>
    • PUT /projects/<project-id>/groups/<group-id>
    • DELETE /projects/<project-id>/groups/<group-id>
  • When a project or template is created project owner access rights are populated automatically in the DB
  • When projects are listed the interface doesn't change, the client still gets access rights as before

Breaking change !! @odeimaiz

• Project Patch and Put will no longer support updating project access rights (even though I have kept it for now there, these values will go out of sync soon and will be fully removed, therefore new /projects/<project-id>/groups endpoints needs to be used!

Related issue/s

• closes Maintenance: move access_rights column in projects to a separate table osparc-issues#1547
• relates Project Folders in User Workspace (Nov.) osparc-issues#716

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.32231% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.1%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (7d624f9).
Report is 355 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #6060      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    84.5%   88.1%    +3.5%     
=========================================
  Files          10    1442    +1432     
  Lines         214   59383   +59169     
  Branches       25    1409    +1384     
=========================================
+ Hits          181   52345   +52164     
- Misses         23    6742    +6719     
- Partials       10     296     +286     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.8% <58.4%> (?)
unittests	86.2% <89.6%> (+1.6%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...core_postgres_database/models/project_to_groups.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...e/src/simcore_postgres_database/models/projects.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...service_webserver/garbage_collector/_core_utils.py	83.8% <100.0%> (ø)
...e_service_webserver/projects/_comments_handlers.py	99.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...rc/simcore_service_webserver/projects/_db_utils.py	97.1% <100.0%> (ø)
.../projects/_projects_nodes_pricing_unit_handlers.py	97.3% <100.0%> (ø)
...re_service_webserver/projects/_wallets_handlers.py	98.1% <100.0%> (ø)
...rver/src/simcore_service_webserver/projects/api.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...erver/src/simcore_service_webserver/projects/db.py	97.3% <100.0%> (ø)
...c/simcore_service_webserver/projects/exceptions.py	94.8% <100.0%> (ø)
... and 6 more

... and 1388 files with indirect coverage changes

[pcrespov]

I guess still WIP, right? Please re-assign for review when ready. thx

[matusdrobuliak66]

I guess still WIP, right? Please re-assign for review when ready. thx

yes, sorry it should be Draft

[sanderegg]

same here ;) see you!

[GitHK]

ask again when done (clearing notification)

[odeimaiz]

Alles klar, merci!

[bisgaard-itis]

Very nice. Thanks a lot for the effort! Just a few suggestions

[GitHK]

Thanks for the massive effort here.
I think we're almost there. Please consider my suggestions below.
Especially the one regarding the table name.

[pcrespov]

Left some suggestions. Please consider them before merging
Thx for the great effort.

[GitHK]

approved as requested