-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unneeded ScriptHash in PReferenceScript/SReferenceScript #959
Draft
carbolymer
wants to merge
2
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
mgalazyn/chore/remove-script-hash-in-policy-id
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+118
−56
Draft
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need a new data definition.
fetchReferenceMintingScriptWitness :: UTxO era -> ScriptWitness WitCtxMint era -> UpdatedReferenceScriptWitness
and in the case where the user chooses to supply it
updateReferenceScriptWitness :: PolicyId -> ScriptWitness WitCtxMint era -> UpdatedReferenceScriptWitness
Propagating
Maybe PolicyId
may work but it results in poor readability. If the user does not supply the policy id we want the ability to query the UTxO to get the reference script witnesses so we can calculate the policy ID.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be the short to medium term fix until we can figure out how to encapsulate this in
cardano-api
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree about the first case with
fetchReferenceMintingScriptWitness
. I'd do this in a follow-up PR.What is not clear to me is how to thread in
Maybe PolicyId
from the CLI argument parser to this place in a clean way. What's your idea about this scenario, when the user providesMaybe PolicyId
manually?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would start with something like:
data MintingReferenceScriptWitness era = MintingReferenceScriptWitness PolicyId (ScriptWitness WitCtxMint era)
In this instance I would insist its done in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries, let me push some changes tomorrow to make sure what I am suggesting can actually work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've removed my comment as I'm still wrapping my head around the idea and experimenting with it. Feel free to push.