Avoid integer overflow when constructing arrays

[giordano]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.30769% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 98.57%. Comparing base (02f5218) to head (d0bde93).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/FixedSizeArrays.jl	92.30%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main      #26      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   98.57%   -1.43%     
===========================================
  Files            1        1              
  Lines           58       70      +12     
===========================================
+ Hits            58       69      +11     
- Misses           0        1       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[giordano]

This method doesn't seem to be actually used? Or are there constructors I'm missing that'd call it?

[nsajko]

This should call it, I'll add a test:

julia> using FixedSizeArrays

julia> FixedSizeArray{Int,0}(undef, ())
0-dimensional FixedSizeArray{Int64, 0}:
0

[nsajko]

Seems to be a Julia code coverage bug. I get the same result when I run ] test --coverage FixedSizeArrays locally.

The method get's explicitly called here, but it's not marked as covered:

d0bde93#diff-3b9314a6f9f2d7eec1d0ef69fa76cfabafdbe6d0df923768f9ec32f27a249c63R26