-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error involving SIGNATURES
and UnionAll
type arguments
#32
Labels
Comments
This was referenced Aug 3, 2017
Closed
Ref: JuliaLang/julia#20872. |
tkoolen
added a commit
to tkoolen/DocStringExtensions.jl
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2017
tkoolen
added a commit
to tkoolen/DocStringExtensions.jl
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2017
tkoolen
added a commit
to tkoolen/DocStringExtensions.jl
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2017
mortenpi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 13, 2017
* Fix #32. * Add tests. * Fix templates for `where` expression header, add test. * Cleanup.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thanks for the great package!
I found an annoying issue on 0.6 related to
UnionAll
types. If you useSIGNATURES
as follows:then
?f
results inThis is because the
sig
passed intogetmethods!
isUnion{Tuple{Type{T}}, Tuple{T}} where T
, which is aUnionAll
, not aUnion
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: