Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove comparison table and just direct to comparison repository #887

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 24, 2023

Conversation

Tortar
Copy link
Member

@Tortar Tortar commented Sep 23, 2023

Probably still too many details are mentioned here. Still the comparison repo doesn't have LOCs calculation, but will add them soon.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #887 (7608dbf) into main (e1e58a7) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #887   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.72%   72.72%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        2871     2871           
=======================================
  Hits         2088     2088           
  Misses        783      783           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Member

@Datseris Datseris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still think you can trim this done much more!

docs/src/comparison.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/comparison.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@Datseris Datseris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am approving this, but we probably need to revisit the "tabled based comparison" as well; Firstly, move it to comparison repo and secondly make it markdown based. But this can happen elsewhere.

(also, it is not clear to me how we would colorcode a markdown based table. Perhpas we could attach a unicode symbol to each cell denoting the "color")

@Datseris Datseris merged commit 5de1674 into main Sep 24, 2023
5 checks passed
@Datseris Datseris deleted the comparison branch September 24, 2023 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants