Add pow for interval^real and interval^interval

[dpsanders]

No description provided.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #42 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #42      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.67%   91.69%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines         961      963       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          881      883       +2     
  Misses         80       80

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/intervals/functions.jl	96.15% <100%> (+0.07%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2ed8164...40eb21a. Read the comment docs.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 92.199% when pulling a612f79 on pow_for_reals into 0d7f112 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 92.199% when pulling a612f79 on pow_for_reals into 0d7f112 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 92.199% when pulling a612f79 on pow_for_reals into 0d7f112 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 92.199% when pulling a612f79 on pow_for_reals into 0d7f112 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 92.199% when pulling a612f79 on pow_for_reals into 0d7f112 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 92.199% when pulling a612f79 on pow_for_reals into 0d7f112 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 92.199% when pulling a612f79 on pow_for_reals into 0d7f112 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 92.199% when pulling a612f79 on pow_for_reals into 0d7f112 on master.

[lbenet]

Tests are missing; otherwise, I think this is ready to be merged.

[dpsanders]

Yes, you're right, it needs tests.

[dpsanders]

Rebased. This is now ready.

[lbenet]

Yes, I agree that we should merge this; let's just allow the test to complete. Thanks!

[lbenet]

Simple curiosity: have you tried to see how many tests of the ITF1788 pass and how many fail, when using pow as a replacement for ^?

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 91.693% when pulling 40eb21a on pow_for_reals into 2ed8164 on master.

[dpsanders]

No I haven't tried, but I expect that almost all will fail...