Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2022. It is now read-only.

Tag GeometryTypes.jl v0.3.0 #9608

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

attobot
Copy link
Contributor

@attobot attobot commented May 30, 2017

Repository: JuliaGeometry/GeometryTypes.jl
Release: v0.3.0
Travis: Travis Build Status
Diff: vs v0.2.2
requires vs v0.2.2:

--- 0.2.2/requires
+++ 0.3.0/requires
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-julia 0.4
-FixedSizeArrays
+julia 0.6-
+StaticArrays
 ColorTypes
-Compat 0.7.15
-Iterators
+Compat 0.18
+FixedPointNumbers

cc: @SimonDanisch

Please make sure that:

  • CI passes for supported Julia versions (if applicable).
  • Version bounds are up to date.

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
julia 0.6-
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should use 0.6.0-pre, since where syntax wouldn't work on early dev versions, better to keep using the 0.5-compatible versions of the package there​

since both 0.4 and 0.5 are being dropped, it would be worth incrementing the minor version by 2, just in case it becomes necessary to make 0.5-only bugfix releases at some point

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since both 0.4 and 0.5 are being dropped, it would be worth incrementing the minor version by 2, just in case it becomes necessary to make 0.5-only bugfix releases at some point

Yes, I can say from experience that this is a good idea.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense, thanks!

@SimonDanisch
Copy link
Contributor

can be closed: #9624

@tkelman tkelman closed this Jun 1, 2017
@attobot attobot deleted the GeometryTypes/v0.3.0 branch June 1, 2017 11:22
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants