Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

macroexpand display regression #17090

Closed
omus opened this issue Jun 24, 2016 · 0 comments · Fixed by #17113
Closed

macroexpand display regression #17090

omus opened this issue Jun 24, 2016 · 0 comments · Fixed by #17113

Comments

@omus
Copy link
Member

omus commented Jun 24, 2016

Two different display issues here:

  1. Functions now are always displayed in parenthesis
  2. Nested calls show: generic function with N method(s)

0.4.6

julia> macroexpand( :(@edit println("")) )
:(Base.edit(println,(Base.typesof)("")))

0.5-dev

julia> macroexpand(:(@edit println("")))
:((Base.edit)(println,(typesof (generic function with 1 method))("")))
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2016
this attribute doesn't nest properly,
and functions just end up branching almost the entire code based
on this parameter, so it's cleaner as a separate method

fix #17087
fix #16910
fix #17090
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2016
this attribute doesn't nest properly,
and functions just end up branching almost the entire code based
on this parameter, so it's cleaner as a separate method

fix #17087
fix #16910
fix #17090
JeffBezanson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 29, 2016
this attribute doesn't nest properly,
and functions just end up branching almost the entire code based
on this parameter, so it's cleaner as a separate method

fix #17087
fix #16910
fix #17090
JeffBezanson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 29, 2016
this attribute doesn't nest properly,
and functions just end up branching almost the entire code based
on this parameter, so it's cleaner as a separate method

fix #17087
fix #16910
fix #17090
mfasi pushed a commit to mfasi/julia that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2016
this attribute doesn't nest properly,
and functions just end up branching almost the entire code based
on this parameter, so it's cleaner as a separate method

fix JuliaLang#17087
fix JuliaLang#16910
fix JuliaLang#17090
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant