subtyping bug: diagonality is ignored in union

[julbinb]

Both julia 0.6.2 and dev incorrectly say true on these judgments (on the left we have equivalent types, on the right the same type):

julia> (Tuple{Q,Bool} where Q<:Union{Int,P} where P) <: Tuple{Union{T,Int}, T} where T
true

julia> (Tuple{Union{Int,P},Bool} where P) <: Tuple{Union{T,Int}, T} where T
true

julia> (Union{Tuple{Int,Bool}, Tuple{P,Bool}} where P) <: Tuple{Union{T,Int}, T} where T
true

Correct answer is false, because variable T is (1) diagonal (2) matched both with P and Bool.

If we rewrite the RHS into an equivalent type with an explicit diagonal type, then julia gives a correct answer.

julia> (Tuple{Union{T,Int}, T} where T) == Union{Tuple{Int, T} where T, Tuple{T1,T1} where T1}
true

julia> (Tuple{Q,Bool} where Q<:Union{Int,P} where P) <: Union{Tuple{Int, T} where T, Tuple{T1,T1} where T1} 
false

julia> (Union{Tuple{Int,Bool}, Tuple{P,Bool}} where P) <: Union{Tuple{Int, T} where T, Tuple{T1,T1} where T1}
false