Add <(::Tuple, ::Tuple) implementing three-valued logic #25099
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
For consistency with ==, as < was the only remaining exception. isless() still returns a Bool, treating missing as greater than any other value.
|
Do we have a lexical ordering comparitor for iterables collections? |
|
We have |
|
@StefanKarpinski OK for this one too? Should be the last of the 3VL series. |
|
Yes, that's good to go. I'm still planning on deprecating |
|
OK, so out of curiosity: the plan is to support lexical ordering for |
|
I was not going to do any iterable, but any abstract array seems reasonable. |
I wonder if |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For consistency with
==, as<was the only remaining exception.islessstill returns aBool, treating missing as greater than any other value.I should have fixed that at the same time as #24963.