-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[OpenBLAS_jll] Bump to v0.3.13+6
#41322
Conversation
This version backports a fix for a `SIGILL` error on some CPUs.
Should this be backported? If so, to what version(s)? |
#39865 has 1.7 milestone |
For me, this PR solves the problem. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixes the issue here too.
Should be backported to 1.6 too. |
Should it? Do we have reports of this issue in Julia v1.6? Julia v1.6 has a different version of openblas, I'd be very wary of mixing binaries versions within a minor version of Julia |
I don’t think it should be backported to 1.6, the error doesn’t occur in 1.6. |
Ok yes. in that case backport not needed for 1.6. I was thinking it had the same openblas version. |
* [OpenBLAS_jll] Bump to `v0.3.13+6` This version backports a fix for a `SIGILL` error on some CPUs. * [deps] Bundle backported OpenBLAS patches
* [OpenBLAS_jll] Bump to `v0.3.13+6` This version backports a fix for a `SIGILL` error on some CPUs. * [deps] Bundle backported OpenBLAS patches
This version backports a fix for a
SIGILL
error on some CPUs.Should fix #39865. @sostock @maleadt would you be able to test this PR on the machines where you can reproduce the issue? CC: @ViralBShah