Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable some FileWatching tests on x86_64 apple #46384

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 18, 2022

Conversation

gbaraldi
Copy link
Member

Macos does some weird event reordoring which means these tests fail often polluting CI output

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

Red #46185, right?

@gbaraldi
Copy link
Member Author

Hopefully yeah

@ViralBShah ViralBShah added the test This change adds or pertains to unit tests label Aug 18, 2022
@Keno Keno added the ci Continuous integration label Aug 18, 2022
@Keno Keno merged commit 2d6e3b9 into JuliaLang:master Aug 18, 2022
while changes[end][1] == F_PATH * "~"
@test pop!(changes)[2] == FileWatching.FileEvent(FileWatching.UV_RENAME)

if !((Sys.ARCH == :x86_64) && (Sys.isapple())) #These tests tend to fail a lot on x86-apple
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoops, I may have been a little overeager. These fail on aarch64 also, so should be disabled everywhere.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I actually haven't seen this fail in FileWatching in aarch64, the only one I've seen was a failure in the PIDFile test.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, but the moment we see it, the test is gone ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci Continuous integration test This change adds or pertains to unit tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants