Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

next steps #6

Open
9 of 12 tasks
jw3126 opened this issue Sep 30, 2019 · 5 comments
Open
9 of 12 tasks

next steps #6

jw3126 opened this issue Sep 30, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@jw3126
Copy link
Member

jw3126 commented Sep 30, 2019

Release

  • Tag a release
  • announce on discourse

Propagate through ecosystem

Feel free to edit this list @tkf @rafaqz

@rafaqz
Copy link
Member

rafaqz commented Oct 1, 2019

Thanks for organising this, unfortunately I'm too busy with travel and deadlines for my modelling packages to help much.

But I'll update all my own packages when this is in metadata.

@tkf
Copy link
Member

tkf commented Oct 12, 2019

Maybe we can release 1.0 sometime soon? Maybe after bringing this up in discourse so that we can get some more feedbacks? I think setproperties and constructorof are pretty solid and already 1.0-ready. Things like setproperties!! #25 can be released with a note saying that it's experimental even after 1.0.

This came up in queryverse/ElectronDisplay.jl#35

@jw3126
Copy link
Member Author

jw3126 commented Oct 12, 2019

I am okay with release 1.0.

@rafaqz
Copy link
Member

rafaqz commented Nov 11, 2019

I'm wondering about the version as well, especially given packages are putting upper bounds on everything for auto-registration. My pull-request for Unitful.jl needs an upper bounds before it can be merged, and other packages will too. Moving to 1.0 will break that... what should our strategy be here?

Edit: I agree releasing 1.0 is reasonable now, especially as full semvar gives more confidence for a package that should be a core dep everywhere, and really wont be changing its inteface.

@jw3126
Copy link
Member Author

jw3126 commented Nov 11, 2019

I think we can just release 1.0 as is and add ConstructionBase="1" to [compat] sections of PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants