-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing documentation in Glossary, Links in Examples and Resolving Issue #66 #68
Conversation
In the specific examples page, the examples links were leading to error pages: https://juliaquantumcontrol.github.io/Krotov.jl/stable/examples/simple_state_to_state/ (leads to 404 error page) Replaced all the links with the correct ones: For instance https://juliaquantumcontrol.github.io/QuantumControlExamples.jl/stable/examples/simple_state_to_state/#Optimization-of-a-State-to-State-Transfer-in-a-Two-Level-System (leads to correct page) |
Some links and description pages in I will change the spelling in the link to parameterization in Example Page of |
Sorry for another workflow run! Now, I made the spelling in the links leading to The pulse_parameterization and other tests except CI doctype all passed in first workflow run though. |
The CI doctype test failing because of extra line. Fixed it. Also, improved the documentation in |
Cool, thanks! Since this is a breaking change, I'll want to let it sit for a bit to accumulate some other breaking changes. In particular, I'm organizing a workshop in two weeks that will feature the QuantumControl package, and I'm not going to merge anything breaking before that. I'll have a look at these PRs afterward. |
Hi Michael, Is this codestyle error simply occuring because we normalized the spelling of one word? In the main, src/ file, the evaluate function used which is same as shown via +, but the diff assumes it's the - minus one. QuantumControl.jl/src/pulse_parametrizations.jl Lines 406 to 411 in 1f575a2
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that’s using the old misspelling (sorry, this is out of context, and no longer applicable. Disregard. I can't figure out how to delete the comment)
Sure, there's a maximum line length, so if you add a letter to word that can push it over the limit, and the line has to be broken into multiple lines |
I see, we can change the maximum line length by a couple letters so that the doc-style test passes? I checked for any potential whitespaces, even used the same src file present in main, just changed ..ri.. to ..eri.. to be sure that there was not any potential whitespaces. |
No, definitely not. Use |
Thanks! I'll explore |
Applied I will now use
|
Test Results
|
Hi, was reading the glossary and found a small typo. Fixed it.