Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

setup modules.jl #210

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

setup modules.jl #210

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

aviatesk
Copy link
Member

  • bundles module-detection code into modules.jl
    • finding module files
    • auto-module detection
  • add some basic tests for them

@aviatesk
Copy link
Member Author

#209 needs to be merged in advance.

@aviatesk aviatesk changed the base branch from master to avi/betterutils October 29, 2019 09:18
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #210 into avi/betterutils will increase coverage by 0.47%.
The diff coverage is 85.57%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           avi/betterutils     #210      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            39.62%   40.09%   +0.47%     
===================================================
  Files                   36       37       +1     
  Lines                 1845     1858      +13     
===================================================
+ Hits                   731      745      +14     
+ Misses                1114     1113       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Atom.jl 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/goto.jl 80.79% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/utils.jl 86.2% <ø> (-5.26%) ⬇️
src/eval.jl 8.57% <ø> (+1.42%) ⬆️
src/comm.jl 31.25% <0%> (-0.67%) ⬇️
src/modules.jl 86.4% <86.4%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 28eb7ac...868a234. Read the comment docs.

@aviatesk aviatesk closed this Oct 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant