Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 5 vulnerabilities #46

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KK68HK
Copy link
Owner

@KK68HK KK68HK commented Oct 22, 2024

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • src/chains/filecoin/filecoin/package.json
    • src/chains/filecoin/filecoin/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
critical severity 776/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.1
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
SNYK-JS-ELLIPTIC-7577916
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 776/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.1
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
SNYK-JS-ELLIPTIC-7577917
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 776/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.1
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
SNYK-JS-ELLIPTIC-7577918
No Proof of Concept
high severity 701/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 8.3
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
SNYK-JS-ELLIPTIC-8172694
No No Known Exploit
high severity 828/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 8.7
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
SNYK-JS-ELLIPTIC-8187303
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: ipfs The new version differs by 250 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 22, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7971377

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

Report too large to display inline

View full report↗︎

Copy link

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
Possible typosquat attack npm/[email protected] ⚠︎

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is a typosquat?

Package name is similar to other popular packages and may not be the package you want.

Use care when consuming similarly named packages and ensure that you did not intend to consume a different package. Malicious packages often publish using similar names as existing popular packages.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected] or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants