Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize ReaderWriter #345

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Optimize ReaderWriter #345

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

IveanEx
Copy link

@IveanEx IveanEx commented Sep 24, 2024

This PR optimizes the following in ReaderWriter:

Replace the spatialAddrGen with full adder implementation
Replace all buffers with pipe buffers (except the scalatest one)

@IveanEx
Copy link
Author

IveanEx commented Sep 24, 2024

@rgantonio If you are free, please check if the critical path in control path (valid / ready hand shaking signal) deteriorates with this improvements 😊😊

Copy link

@rgantonio rgantonio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Setting barrier here first before merge hehe. So that we make sure that the necessary changes are indeed helpful 😄

Wait a few hours hold on. I will test.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm please don't put backups in the repo. Leave them be in the local computers.

@rgantonio
Copy link

Also, did you trace or check in Chisel if it fixes the long path?

Copy link

@rgantonio rgantonio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok! I can test tomorrow but was this pipe thing from the queue the fix? I can test in synthesis first before plugging in.

@xiaoling-yi xiaoling-yi merged commit 3c94494 into main Sep 25, 2024
23 checks passed
@xiaoling-yi xiaoling-yi deleted the ydeng/optimizeReaderWriter branch September 25, 2024 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants