Scaling economy idea #966
Open
Scaling economy idea #966
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
Adds a new parameter option (default on right now, but that can obviously be changed) to have a scaling economy penalty.
This would increase the resource costs for all build menu items times the number of FOBs the players have built.
The idea came from playing Lib and noticing that very often after a certain point the resource cost of most things can become a non-issue. This can add an extra layer of thought in whether to build that next FOB or not. Think of it like the cost of maintaining the supply lines between all the FOBs.
This is really quite literally just a shower thought I had, only something for people who really want to push themselves in Lib.
Content:
Successfully tested on: