Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add compensation logic in service-available calculation #120

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023

Conversation

WeichengWang1
Copy link
Collaborator

@WeichengWang1 WeichengWang1 commented Nov 16, 2023

1. Does this PR affect any open issues?(Y/N) and add issue references (e.g. "fix #123", "re #123".):

re #119

  • N
  • Y

2. What is the scope of this PR (e.g. component or file name):

3. Provide a description of the PR(e.g. more details, effects, motivations or doc link):

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Other

4. Are there any breaking changes?(Y/N) and describe the breaking changes(e.g. more details, motivations or doc link):

  • N
  • Y

5. Are there test cases for these changes?(Y/N) select and add more details, references or doc links:

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Benchmark (add benchmark stats below)
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • Other

6. Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 16, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@5aea78d). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #120   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   46.14%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       45           
  Lines           ?     3558           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1642           
  Misses          ?     1701           
  Partials        ?      215           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 46.14% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

dirtyExpectedFinalizer[expectedFinalizerKey] = finalizer
continue
}
notDirtyExist = true
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wu8685 shall we make it break the for loop here as long as notDirtyExist?
pros: no need to get all service and check if selected
cons: dirty expected finalizer might not be cleaned in time

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, looks better

@WeichengWang1 WeichengWang1 merged commit 412b4f2 into KusionStack:main Nov 17, 2023
7 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 17, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants