Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate typings to @rdfjs/types #53

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

rubensworks
Copy link
Member

This also removes the namespace, which is considered bad practise now in TS.

This also removes the namespace, which is considered bad practise now in
TS.
limit?: number;
position?: "subject" | "predicate" | "object";
prefix?: string;
subject?: string; // mutually exclusive with prefix and prioritized
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't there a better type then if they are mutually exclusive?
But no need to do that in this PR.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, would probably be better indeed!

@RubenVerborgh RubenVerborgh merged commit b979292 into LinkedDataFragments:main Mar 25, 2024
3 checks passed
@rubensworks rubensworks deleted the fix/ts branch March 25, 2024 11:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants