Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements to checking for the existence of a {@select} state. #125

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2015

Conversation

sethkinast
Copy link
Contributor

The most immediate effect of this change is the ability to use {@any} and {@none} with multikey selects (still an undocumented feature)

Closes #124

The most immediate effect of this change is the ability to use {@any} and {@none} with multikey selects (still an undocumented feature)
prashn64 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2015
Improvements to checking for the existence of a {@select} state.
@prashn64 prashn64 merged commit 762806a into LinkedInAttic:master Mar 24, 2015
@sethkinast sethkinast deleted the selectState branch March 25, 2015 00:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

{@select}s with multiple keys break when used with {@any} / {@none}
2 participants