Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Postsrsd to avoid SPF rejects when Mailu used as MTA #1042

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jbmolle
Copy link

@jbmolle jbmolle commented Jun 7, 2019

This PR should resolve #328
It implements Postsrsd with Mailu Postfix so that emails from alias are not rejected under SPF protocol.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 7, 2019

Thanks for submitting this pull request.
Bors-ng will now build test images. When it succeeds, we will continue to review and test your PR.

bors try

Note: if this build fails, read this.

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jun 7, 2019

try

Build failed

Copy link
Member

@kaiyou kaiyou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some suggested changes, but I'll make a more general comment tonight when I find the time.

@@ -112,4 +112,7 @@ milter_default_action = tempfail
###############
# Extra Settings
###############

sender_canonical_maps = tcp:localhost:10001
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would put these under a previous section specific to SRS instead of just extra settings.

@@ -50,7 +51,9 @@ def start_podop():

convert("/conf/rsyslog.conf", "/etc/rsyslog.conf")

# Run Podop and Postfix
# Generate SRS Secret file, start SRS, run Podop and Postfix
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel bad about this. Maybe we could use native python (os.urandom and files)?

@oli-ver oli-ver mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2019
@Nebukadneza
Copy link
Member

The more current #1349 looks less invasive, and generally like a leaner solution to me. If we go ahead merging #1349 , would it be okay if we closed this one after that? Sorry for sounding so harsh, and nevertheless thanks a lot for the work put into this @jbmolle !

@muhlemmer
Copy link
Member

@jbmolle thank you for your submission. We have implemented SRS by a different method in #1349. This PR will now be closed, hopefully without hard feelings. We would like to welcome you for contributions in the future!

@muhlemmer muhlemmer closed this Apr 30, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for SRS
4 participants