Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor start_retirement method for Cloud Orchestration Retirement. #615

Conversation

billfitzgerald0120
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is based on the issue below.
ManageIQ/manageiq#12038

@miq-bot add_label refactoring
@miq-bot assign @tinaafitz

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 11, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3989

  • 32 of 32 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.05%) to 97.293%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3985: 0.05%
Covered Lines: 3055
Relevant Lines: 3140

💛 - Coveralls

This PR is based on the issue below.
ManageIQ/manageiq#12038

@miq-bot add_label refactoring
@miq-bot assign @tinaafitz

Since I refactored the method the old spec tests failed.
Removed old spec test from orchestration_retirement_spec.rb
    in spec/automation/unit/method_validation
@billfitzgerald0120 billfitzgerald0120 force-pushed the refactor_cloud_orch_retirement_start_retirement branch from 5c926f2 to 29140d7 Compare December 12, 2019 22:16
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Dec 12, 2019

Checked commit billfitzgerald0120@29140d7 with ruby 2.5.5, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
3 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

@gmcculloug gmcculloug requested a review from lfu January 24, 2020 15:56
@tinaafitz tinaafitz merged commit a370828 into ManageIQ:master Jan 27, 2020
@mfeifer mfeifer added this to the Sprint 129 Ending Feb 3, 2020 milestone Feb 4, 2020
@billfitzgerald0120
Copy link
Contributor Author

@miq-bot add_label changelog/yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants